« April 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Conversational Quirps
Monday, 5 April 2004
Men and Women
Topic: Self
So, I'm doing research, talking to people, gathering information about how people get along and communicate and interact and... flirt...

And one young man said that he doesn't think that there is anything wrong with flirting, but that he "knows how to behave" and "would not act on" the flirting.

I asked him if he flirts in front of his woman. He said "of course not," that "that would be rude."

After much additional conversation, he said that he should "not have to explain himself," (I think that was in response to me saying that if my guy thought that flirting was okay, I would want him to flirt in front of me, instead of having a different set of "okay" behavior when I'm around) that if his behavior matches what he has said about himself, that should be enough.

I don't think that it is "explaining" - it's being willing to be in full disclosure with your partner. Having a separate set of behavior when your partner is around allows things to happen - what starts as an innocent flirtation becomes a friend at work, becomes someone to talk to as my partner and I work through the next rough period in our relationship - and then there's the potential for a late night, a big fight, a couple of drinks, and the unpleasant but all too familiar phrase "it just happened."

There is no chance that I could ever just happen to do anything - I know it, and my guy knows it, because anytime I am attracted to another man, my sweetheart knows about it. The same thing is true from him to me. Both men and women respond to this idea with lots of speculation. But I believe that most men think like the young man I was talking to, that there is some level of engagement with other women that is acceptable, even if you are married, you just aren't supposed to do it around your woman; most women say "he better not tell me he's interested in someone else!" - so they seem to be in agreement.

But if this idea of "separate but faithful" worked, you wouldn't have so much extra-curricular activity going on in everybody's relationships. I close the door firmly on any possible affairs by talking about them before they even become a viable possibility - while the man in question is just attractive or handsome or sexy to me - I couldn't possibly take any steps down an extra-curricular path except by conscious decision, and additional disclosure to my guy - "This guy that I told you I'm attracted to, I'm going to start going to lunch with him, because I like talking to him. Now, nothing is going to happen, I just like him as a friend."

I know lots of you are saying that I'm crazy, and that this is b.s., but here's the challenge. Try it. Maybe not with your partner, but only with yourself. Write down those people that you meet and are attracted to when you first meet them, and keep track of where the relationships go. See if you don't look up in 6 months, or 6 years, having to make some decisions about how far things should go. Ask yourelf when it becomes awkward but necessary to talk to your partner about this person, is it more or less awkward than it would have been if you had told them about the attraction from the beginning?

'Nuff said.

Posted by Q at 11:11 PM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, 7 April 2004 11:21 PM CDT
Thursday, 1 April 2004
Mo Money (California Style)
Topic: Corporate Info
Pan Pacific Retail Properties is listed as a Real Estate Investment Trust in California; 135 employees, including 11 well-paid executives - these included. They specialize in shopping malls.



Posted by Q at 3:55 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:48 PM CST
Wednesday, 31 March 2004
Movie Fun ds
Topic: Corporate Info
Well, who doesn't know what kind of business Time Warner Inc. is in? They are listed as being out of New York, and in the "Services - Motion Picture and Video Tape Production" business. I didn't want to distract you with numbers of employees; wanted to emphasize the numbers made by those at the top. Anyone know anybody who would want to pay for research into the race aspect of these numbers? As in who is getting what?



Posted by Q at 10:59 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:41 PM CST
Tuesday, 30 March 2004
Upscale Apartment Managers
Topic: Corporate Info
United Dominion Realty Trust Inc. is listed as a Real Estate Investment Trust out of Virginia with 1832 Full time employees. They specialize in the acquisition and management of apartment buildings. I don't what the conditions are in the buildings they manage, but based on these salaries, the ones they live in must be very nice, indeed!

Posted by Q at 9:00 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:31 PM CST
Monday, 29 March 2004
International Doctoring
Topic: Corporate Info
Cambrex Corporation is located in New Jersey, but incorporated out of Delaware. They are listed as a Human Health BioPharma/BioProducts firm; their annual report describes them as the maker of pharaceutical preparations. Cambrex employs 1861 people, at least 1/2 of which are international.



Posted by Q at 4:21 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:25 PM CST
Friday, 26 March 2004
Enron Who?
Topic: Corporate Info
Here is information on Prentiss Properties Trust. Located in Dallas, Prentiss employees 475 people and is listed as a real estate investment trust. They specialize in office properties, and as you can see, they have a "Prentiss" being well compensated. I wonder if the inheritance tax changes affect this kind of arrangement, or did this arrangement bypass the inheritance tax laws as they used to be? Either way, these top players had a great 2003!



Posted by Q at 10:38 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:19 PM CST
Thursday, 25 March 2004
Tech Ain't Dead
Topic: Corporate Info
MKS Instruments out of Massachussetts is in the business of manufacturing industrial instruments for measurement, display and control. In other words, they are involved in the manufacturing of semi-conductors, flat panels, optical coatings, optical fibers, etc. They employee 2144 employees.



Posted by Q at 7:51 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:10 PM CST
Wednesday, 24 March 2004
Bank on It
Topic: Corporate Info
Western Sierra Bankcorp is listed as a State Commercial Bank in California. They employee 349 employees "on an FTE basis." Hmmmm, wonder what that means. Lots of flex time? Or, lots of part time folks, not getting benefits?

These fellas are sure getting theirs.



Posted by Q at 9:32 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 5:02 PM CST
Tuesday, 23 March 2004
Risky (But Worthwhile) Business
Topic: Corporate Info
Here is information on Aksys Ltd. Located in downstate Illinois, Aksys employees 103 employees, primarily in R&D (36), Tech and Clinical Services (20) and Sales (19). Listed as an Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus business, Aksys is working on a new, at-home hemodialysis product. The company warned investors in its most recent annual report that the business has been non-profitable since its inception in 2001, and that its future depends upon its ability to finalize its new product and then to convince patients and doctors to use it. In the meantime...



Posted by Q at 8:09 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 4:55 PM CST
Monday, 22 March 2004
Cooking Money
Topic: Corporate Info
Spectrum Organic Products Inc. employees 59 full time employees in California. Listed as a company engaged in the "Canned Fruits, Vegetables, Preserves, Jams and Jellies" business, their annual report indicates that their food products are primarily oil-based foods, such as cooking oils. Not the highest numbers we found, but... I'd take it. Wouldn't you?



Posted by Q at 10:31 PM CST
Updated: Sunday, 4 April 2004 4:46 PM CST

Newer | Latest | Older